I survived Sandy‘s visit, but a week without power has certainly changed the way I think about my mobile devices. As everybody knows, our devices get exponentially more powerful every year (this is called Moore’s Law, though many smart people do not think that growth will continue at this rate). However, the efficiency of batteries has not been increasing in a comparable fashion. That’s why my old dumb phone could go days without plugging in, while an iPhone runs crying to its charging dock every 8 hours. New devices are designed for the best possible world where power is always available. My experience during Sandy has showed me that this is a dangerous way to think. So, two ideas to consider:
First, we could change the way mobile devices treat power. All devices should have an “extreme” power conservation mode. There is no reason why I shouldn’t be able to set my SmartPhone to a mode that will maximize my ability to send and receive emergency calls and text, but suspend all other functions. Also, we might think about better ways for devices to communicate the consequences of user decisions on battery life. For example, in “cautious” power conservation mode, the phone can let the user know that (say) turning on the GPS for 15 minutes will take the phone from 45% power to 40% power. Or that trying to maintain signal in the subway will significantly drain batteries. As with the way that giving energy use feedback in Hybrid cars changed the way people drive, I think this will quickly change the way people use their phones in power-scarce situations.
Second, we could introduce redundant ways of powering up one’s devices. Over this crisis, I came to rely on my handcrank LED flashlight that I got as conference swag at some point. I want more things like it! I want to be able to charge all my devices with some combination of cranking, walking, pedaling, and whatever. Can I harness the power of the wind during a tornado? Emergency solar? One of my coworkers had the idea of harnessing power from more resilient home infrastructure, such as a gas stove. What about running water? A lot of these devices already exist but seems to be quite inefficient and prohibitively expensive.
The point is that our mobile devices are no longer a luxury, they are a necessity to keep us safe and connected. I think it is important to think about what happens when everything else fails.
The problem is that what takes the most energy on a phone is
– screen
– radio
so your “extreme energy saving mode” would result in barely any gain.
Older phones could deal because they had
– weaker radios
– b&w low pixel density screen.
Well, why can’t the “extreme” energy saving mode include powering down the radio? Why can’t phones switch to a b&w low rez display in low power situations? I think we can be clever about it when we give it some thought (just take a look at some power-saving and generating features of the OLPC – http://one.laptop.org/). The issue is not that it isn’t possible, but rather that we don’t think it’s necessary enough to think about…
Of you could buy a spare emergency phone that runs of an AA battery and move your SIM card over to it when you need a low power phone. (You do use a GSM phone, right? ;>)
I have one of these sitting around for just that use case. (And even without a SIM card from a “regular” phone account, it can still make emergency calls.)
http://spareone.com/spareone/spareone-emergency-phone
No display, very simple radio.
That’s not a bad idea at all… I use a SIM-based service provider (duh! since I work for them), so that’s at least one big advantage I should use!
Wonder if solar power could be an option. Why can’t a cell phone also come with a solar battery or can’t we have a mobile solar panel based charging station at home? That way, more than one device can be charged (esp. medical devices)
We have to take inspiration from Tesla (http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-09-25/tesla-fires-up-solar-powered-charging-stations)
In addition, if every building were to generate some solar power, maybe it would be sufficient to provide a charging station or power the elevators. Like Deutsche Bank.(https://www.db.com/usa/content/en/2268.html)
However, it would be a very nice Jiu-jitsu moment if we could use the power of the hurricane to generate power (http://blog.cees-edu.org/how-to-harness-the-power-of-a-hurricane-to-power-cities/)
Thanks for the comments y’all. There’s also a discussion around this post developing on Facebook, so as usual, I’ll add that here as well:
Sekou Remy: (I agree deeply with your post) Much of this tech is already here though… The catch is that the typical consumer only cares about these things when there’s an issue.. “We” only go into conservation when things get critical.. (lake is below level, bees/frogs/trees are all gone, new years resolutions, etc.) Until “they” can figure out how to monetize this need…
Lana Yarosh: Oh, also, somebody at work just mailed me this: http://www.instructables.com/id/Thermoelectric-USB-charger/ Check it out!
Hank Blumenthal: There are many hand cranked cell phone chargers if you do a google search. Many are combined radio/flashlight/cell phone chargers as cheap as $12. I have had an Eton that cost about $40 that is really good and includes shortwave. I may have to check if it still works with my iphone. Solar powered flashlights are cheap too.
Lana Yarosh: Hank, I’ve seen some and I do link to a few in the blog. My understanding is that none of them are terribly efficient. The point is that one way of doing it isn’t enough. We need, lots of alternatives!
Craig Tashman: Lana Yarosh, your point about the cell phone power drain is interesting. My Thinkpad, for example, has crazy amount of this, including a special battery stretch mode that will shut down the DVD drive, reduce the graphics card settings, and even darken inactive windows on the screen to reduce power consumed by the LCD (not the light, the LC matrix itself)–all to add a few extra minutes of battery life. (I wish they’d just included a larger battery, but that’s another issue.) So this kind of thing works well on laptops, and bringing it to smartphones makes a lot of sense. But I could see one downside for, say, Apple, being that many people will leave the unit in a battery conservation mode of some sort, become more aware of their power usage, adapt to use less power, enjoy their phones less, and have a net worse user experience.
Lana Yarosh: Craig, good point about user experience. But shouldn’t the user be able to chose what kind of experience s/he gets? Or do you think this is one of those situations where the paradox of choice means that people would be happier if you made the decision for them?
Craig Tashman: Lana Yarosh, good thought. Personally, I believe the answer is yes to both. I’m not sure it’s the choice per se that will be the problem, but rather the information–that trying to optimize the big Power Usage number that stares them in the face (in some sense) will lead them to more restrictive behaviors. They probably would be happier if they didn’t have the choice to see that information. But yet I agree that people should have that choice–it’s their responsibility what information to consume and how to react to it. Paternalistic design makes sense to me, but I still fervently reject it. What do you think?
Morgan Ames: Power and internet connectivity both – and there are still plenty of places in the world where both are often unavailable. OLPC tried but largely failed to address this — it is a difficult problem. Meanwhile, more and more things require more and more frequent charging, and more apps demand to be able to call home to function.
Sekou Remy: http://ceoforchange.com/What-is-CEO-for-Change
[…] EMERGENCY BATTERY BACKUP BLACK (*2-pack*).>S< Shopping for Min Qty 60 Solar Flashlights ShopHungry for Power var ContentWidth = ''; function breakfree() { if ( top.location != self.location ) { […]