Category Archives: Child-Computer Interaction

Lessons from Uber-Successful Games for Kids

Posted on by
6

Pokemon and Neopets are two incredibly successful games. What do they have in common and how are they different?

I’ve been thinking a lot about game elements that are common to successful games. Now, let me preface this by saying that I’m by no means a games researcher, just an observer. In this post, I want to examine two games for children that have been incredibly successful. By successful, I mean that these games have been around for more than 10 years and still command a great share of the market. This means that they are able to retain players as they grow up and/or attract new players.

The first is the Pokemon series of games, which has sold 220 million games so far and has been around since 1996. The core games are made for the mobile platform (Gameboy before, Nintendo DS now). This RPG game allows players to move through a storyline, while encountering, collecting, and battling animal-like creatures called Pokemon. The Pokemon universe was one of the first and most successful to combine video games, trading cards, TV series, and physical toys in a consistent campaign (with no one part as an afterthought to the other parts)  — a model later followed by a number of other franchises such as Yu-Gi-Oh and Digimon. The aspects that define the Pokemon games are:

  • Collecting Pokemon, by catching them in-game and by trading with friends
  • Creating teams and strategies for battles in-game, against friends, and in global tournaments
  • In-game, RPG-style world to explore while playing through a storyline
  • Willingness to explore new technologies as peripheral game components, such as incorporating physical activity, augmented reality, etc.
Though Pokemon has experimented with a variety of non-battle-based ideas such as dressing up the Pokemon, decorating a secret base, and participating in Beauty Contests to earn ribbons, none of the concepts have succeeded in the game (e.g. survived for more than one generation). Pokemon tends to be more popular with males (e.g., see GL stats).

The second is Neopets, which is a very popular online community launched in 1999 that reached 1 trillion page views in 2011. In Neopets, a player adopts imaginary pets and is responsible for feeding and training them. Playing a variety of simple flash games earns points to buy food, clothes, etc. for the pets. A number of more recent games have emulated Neopets including Subeta, Club Penguin, and Webkinz. Most important features of Neopets are:
  • Customizing the look of the pet to express personality and style
  • Earning trophies by participating in site events, submitting user-created content (e.g., drawings, stories), and earning high scores in Flash games
  • Socially interacting with other players through moderated forums or in-game email-like messages (when over 13 or with parental consent)
  • Creating and customizing homes for pets, shops, and galleries
  • Collecting avatars, stamps, and more
  • Battling pets event single-player challengers or friends in the Battledome

Though Neopets has tried to branch out onto the mobile platform with spin-off games like Lutari Island and Puzzle Adventure for DS, neither of these approaches were particularly successful. Currently, it is very difficult to participate in Neopets on a mobile device. One note of interest is that most Neopets players are female.

Overall, I’d say that Neopets is more focused on self-expression and social interaction, while Pokemon is more focused on strategy and competition, but there are four elements that these games share in common:

  • Focus on collecting — in Pokemon this is a key feature of the game; in Neopets it was not designed as a core feature but has become so over time with the introduction of stamps and avatars
  • Pets — something about the idea of caring for and training a pet that seems to be consistently engaging to children
  • Activities outside the game that help succeed in the game — in Pokemon, these activities take shape of attending tournaments and using pedometer feature; in Neopets, these activities take shape of creating drawings, sculptures, and stories for in-game contests.
  • Many ways to succeed — in Pokemon, you can focus on exploring, collecting, training, breeding, or battling Pokemon in underused, overused, and uber tiers; in Neopets, you can focus on exploring, customizing, collecting, trading, drawing, writing, and playing games. There are some general heuristics for what it means to be a successful player in either game, but its hard to directly compare two people. Each player is just different.

I don’t think any of these points are new, but I think that examining Neopets and Pokemon as two successful case studies can confirm that indeed these strategies work.

Family Tech Workshop @ CHI 2012

Posted on by
Reply

Yesterday, I got a chance to participate in the “Technology for Today’s Family” workshop at CHI 2012. Even though I arrived late (because of having to be at commencement the previous day), I felt like I got a lot out of it. Not only was it great to see some great folks who do work in this space, but I got a lot of ideas for future things I want to try. These weren’t necessarily long discussions during the workshop, but these are things that I jotted down:

  1. “Contrarian Design” — this is a technique for defamiliarization and eliciting design feedback. Instead of considering what may be a good design in the space, it focuses on eliciting bad designs. Looking at these ideas can point to issues of importance to families that might otherwise be difficult to elicit. For example, in the workshop Scott Mainwaring (Intel) role played as a grandmother and presented a contrarian design communication gadget that had an inaccessible interface, presented meaningless shared information (Tweets), and required a service fee each time you used it. This is a fun exercise and I think I’ll incorporate it into my interviewing practices in the future.
  2. Using Kickstarter as a way for quickly gauging interest in a design idea — just put the idea up on kickstarter.com to get the crowd to give you feedback on your design. In the future, I might put up two or three ideas simultaneously and let them battle it out!
  3. Disseminating ideas from a workshop — I think the difficulty every workshop faces is the questions of “what next?” I’ve certainly been in my share of workshops where there was talk of special issues or books at the end, but this only rarely pans out. So, what is there between the “see you around!” and “we’ll write a special issue!”? I thought that we actually came up with some great ideas for keeping the momentum going. In the short term, each workshop member committed to posting about the workshop to their social media of choice. In the medium term, we will write a short article for the interactions magazine to discuss some of the biggest challenges in the space of designing for families. In the long term, we may pursue the more ambitious book and/or special issue of a journal goal. We were particularly excited about giving this a more method-centered spin. But, I’ll definitely be trying a similar structure for disseminating ideas at the next workshop I organize!